you're reading...
Pre-2008 Posts

Sanchez Forced Out, Blames Abu Ghraib “Prison Scandal”

Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez resents being forced out:

(CBS/AP) Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez, who served a tumultuous year as commander of all U.S. forces in Iraq, retired from the Army on Wednesday, calling his career a casualty of the Abu Ghraib prison scandal.

He pointed to the Abu Ghraib prison scandal as the key reason for his departure.

He said for a story in The Monitor in McAllen, Texas, “that’s the key reason, the sole reason, that I was forced to retire. I was essentially not offered another position in either a three-star or four-star command.”

He had been a candidate to become the next commander of U.S. Southern Command. But he was passed over after the Abu Ghraib prisoner abuse scandal exploded into an international controversy.

Sanchez has not been accused of any misconduct but has been criticized by some for not doing more to avoid mistreatment of Iraqi prisoners.

I mean, so what if under Sanchez’s watch, innocent Iraqi civilians were rounded up, sexually assaulted, and tortured? 

Following is a good  comment I came across on a Democratic Underground bb:

[Sanchez] was the commander immediately responsible for a long campaign of raids into Sunni towns and villages that swept military aged males, in an nearly indiscriminate fashion, into the interrogation system, including the mass detention of Sunnis in Abu Ghraib. Thousands of men and boys were arrested, humiliated and herded into Abu Ghraib for interrogation without any evidence that they were part of the insurgency. There in Saddam’s old torture palace, Iraqi men learned to hate Americans and mixed with already committed Sunni insurgents–becoming radicalized by them. Petty criminals, innocent bystanders and ticked off Arabs who merely threw flip flops at American tanks mixed with dead-ender Ba’athists and Iraqi soldiers who knew how to make IEDs. As with such prisons in the past (see the film Indochine for an example), Abu Ghraib under American control functioned like a factory to create and strengthen the insurgency it was supposedly being used to combat.

Even if Dirty Sanchez didn’t order torture himself, his approach to “pacifying” Sunni areas with mass roundups of village men for interrogation makes him responsible for losing the hearts and minds of the Iraqi people. In their last cynical throes the Republicans are going around asking critics if they “want America to win in Iraq.” If there ever was any chance for America to “win in Iraq”–to achieve our stated political objectives of replacing Saddam’s dictatorship with a pluralist democratic republic–the typically Republican, sadistic, authoritarian tactics of General Sanchez totally destroyed those chances in the first year of our occupation there.




2 thoughts on “Sanchez Forced Out, Blames Abu Ghraib “Prison Scandal”

  1. I may be misremembering but it was my impression from the news reports (including a long article in the New Yorker) I read at the time the AG scandal broke, that Sanchez’ role in promoting the policy of torture was greater than it is now represented as having been. Does anyone remember better (I guess I could look it up, but my point for now is he is being VERY weasely, and YES he’s a terrorist, I’d say).

    Posted by profacero | November 3, 2006, 7:58 pm
  2. I guess this is the way the old order does things. The perpertrators of the abuse at AG (notibly Lyndsey England) where tried and punished in the full glare of publicity. England came in for particular attention because she was a woman, but why is it somhow more ‘understandable’ for men to sadistically abuse prisoners then it is for a woman?
    The defence of the guards at AG has never been fully investigated. They claimed they where SPECIFICALLY told to abuse the prisoners in this way by the ‘security service’ (read CIA).
    Its obvious that sexually sadistic abuse has been used in other places notibly Afganistan and Guantanimo Bay, as well as in Europe by other ‘Security Services’
    Why would they decide that this is the best way to ‘break down’ a prisoner, to make them divulge information, or submit to the interorgators whims? You can bet there will have been investigations into what form of abuse is best at breaking a recipients will to resist, and it seems that sexual abuse, similar to what occurs in BDSM is the abuse of choice of the security services.
    It certainly gives cause for thought about the amount of freedom women who claim to like to be absued by men in BDSM really have.

    As for Sanchez he broke the first rule, He got caught. Thats why he has had to retire early.

    Posted by Corneilius | November 6, 2006, 12:14 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Blog Stats

  • 2,599,004 hits

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.


The Farm at Huge Creek, Michigan Womyn's Music Festival, The Feminist Hullaballoo