you're reading...
Women's Birthing Rights, Women's Bodies

Closing the Aradia Clinic and the Future of the Feminist Women’s Health Care Movement

Our Bodies Our Selves

 I blogged about the closure of the Aradia Women’s Health Center in Seattle a couple of days ago, but I keep thinking about it and feeling so discouraged and morbid, wanting to talk about the significance of this closure.   One of the greatest accomplishments of feminism in this century is the feminist women’s health care movement.  Any of us who recalls the ’70s remembers the exhilaration we all felt as we, as women, began to take charge of our own bodies and our own health, everything from learning to use speculums to exam our own cervices to learn what they looked like for the first time (instead of laying passively in embarrassment, draped under sheets, as male doctors poked and probed parts of our bodies we’d been taught were shameful and dirty), to the doula and midwifery movements, to insisting on laboring and birthing in our own way, to helping women to obtain birth control and abortions and holding women’s hands as they had abortions, if they chose to, or offering them support and resources if they had been raped.

On January 2, Amie Newman, Communications Manager at Aradia until it closes on January 31, blogged about the closure so eloquently:

I’m wiping my computer clean of all my files, shredding old AWHC newsletters and boxing up documents. I’m actively dissolving one of Washington State’s most experienced and vocal voices on reproductive rights and health, and wondering how this happened and how we got here. While the answers to these questions may not be entirely clear, the leaders of both the past and present feminist health movement which gave birth to centers like AWHC have a lot to say about it.

As Marcy Bloom, AWHC’s former Executive Director for eighteen years says, “The closing of AWHC is a dramatic sign of our times. The federal government has not funded abortion care since 1978. Our state Medicaid fiscal reimbursements do not cover the costs of providing care. Costs of medical supplies, malpractice insurance and rent have skyrocketed. Abortion is on the decline in the United States,” she adds, “except for low-income women. A true societal commitment to quality, funded health care for poor and marginalized women (the majority of Aradia’s clients) still eludes us.”

Beverly Whipple, current executive director of Cedar River Clinics, a trio of feminist women’s health centers in Washington says it may be too late for hers and the remaining centers around the country. “I don’t know if it’s sustainable or not anymore – it depends on what the world wants. Other clinics [besides Aradia] are struggling and may not make it. It might be too late.”

Before we can examine what exactly led to Aradia’s downfall and what the future may hold for feminist women’s health centers in general, something needs to be said about the history of feminist health care in the United States. AWHC, along with at least 15 other centers around the country, was founded in 1972, before abortion became legal for women in the United States. As Bloom puts it, “We were women’s health and abortion rights trailblazers and pioneers in every way.” And she’s right.

In its history, Aradia provided more than 54,000 women with abortion and gynecological health care services, trained more than 1,000 medical students in abortion care and served as a sort of public health prep-school for hundreds of staff women and volunteers. Aradia incorporated outreach, education and state-level legislative advocacy into its work, and became one of Washington State’s most energetic advocates for women’s health. Aradia helped pass the Washington State Reproductive Privacy Act (our state’s version of Roe v. Wade ), worked to advocate for the development of a viable microbicide for women worldwide, labored to keep Washington pharmacists from obtaining the right to refuse emergency contraception prescriptions, and all the while strove to destigmatize abortion for all women. AWHC was a remarkable force with which to be reckoned for more than three decades.

Though the concept of feminist health care may not mean the same thing to all women, feminists today can agree that the feminist clinics that arose in the early 1970’s were responsible in large part for some immense gains for women. In response to the risk feminist health centers now face, the Consortium: A National Network of Feminist Reproductive Health Centers was formed and states that:

You have the feminist women’s health movement to thank if you:

  • Were offered a cervical cap as a birth control option
  • Had a natural childbirth
  • Had your partner with you during your abortion
  • Purchased an over-the-counter pregnancy test
  • Participated in informed consent

With all these clear, attributable advancements, it is astonishing that so many still don’t recognize the feminist women’s health movement’s many contributions to the healthcare landscape in general and to women’s lives in particular. It’s a shame, because it seems that we may be heading toward the end of an identifiable era of great value to women in America.

The feminist women’s health movement gave birth to feminist health centers and, at its zenith in the mid-eighties, there were over 50 such centers around the United States. Over the last twenty or so years, an estimated thirty-five of those clinics have closed their doors forever. Clearly, something dramatic is happening.

The growing numbers of closed feminist health centers in the United States represents a tremendous loss for women in our country, according to Beverly Whipple. “Women will get healthcare, but not the same kind of care. In general, providers don’t interact [with female patients] first as women and then as patients, but first as patients and then as women.”

Comparing private-practice abortion care to feminist health care, Carol Downer, one of the founding mothers of the feminist health care movement says, “Women go into those provider’s offices and no matter how good the medical care is they come out feeling ashamed. Not true with feminist health centers. We REALLY believe in the rights of all women that come through our doors. We treat a woman with respect. Therefore the [abortion] experience, rather than producing shame, gives her a feeling that she can go on.”

The loss of Aradia will be hard to measure in quantifiable terms. Seattle is well-served in the number of abortion providers practicing in our area, but with rising numbers of low-income women accessing abortion services in the United States, and a health care system that seems to fail our lower income fellow Americans in general, there are many questions left unanswered about the future of feminist health care. Next week, I will explore the challenges faced by Aradia and its fellow Consortium members and the consequences for women served by these centers, as well as potential shortcomings in the broader feminist health movement leading to its current struggles.

In another post about Aradia closing, Newman writes:

Carol Downer, the Los Angeles Feminist Women’s Health Center’s first executive director, tells the story of the Atlanta Feminist Health Center’s embroilment with the IRS in the early 1990’s. “The IRS was investigating the center and so the health center hired their own accountants to pore through years of billing and accounting. What the center found shocked them.” The Atlanta Feminist Health Center was giving away approximately 30% of their services for free: phone counseling, public presentations and education, subsidy for services when women could not afford it, etc. For anyone who has ever worked at a feminist women’s health center this should come as no surprise, however. It was often a point of pride and consternation for the leaders of Aradia Women’s Health Center (AWHC) in Seattle, my employer for three more weeks until its closure, that the center subsidized abortion care for its clients (patients) in upwards of $500,000 some years. The fact is, AWHC made no money providing any of its care whether it was pap smears, sexually transmitted infection testing, family planning or abortion services. Our discounted fee schedule, our unique health care model that ensured that every woman who came through our doors received as much as time as she needed for her appointment, and finally our belief that all women have a right to empowering, high-quality, compassionate health care regardless of their ability to pay, helped to create a wonderful health care model that was, ultimately, not a viable business model.

This is the heritage and the legacy that girls and women in the U.S. are in danger of losing.  It’s very true– women serving and supporting one another, caring for women who are poor, making sure each woman is respected and given plenty of time,  is not a “viable business model” in this age we’re living in.  It’s also so true that whether or not this important face of our movement survives depends on what women want.   That’s the part that worries me the most.  It seems ironic that headline news yesterday featured a story about a woman who asked doctors to induce her labor so her birth wouldn’t disturb her husband’s plans to watch the Super Bowl.  Where these seem to be women’s priorities, and doctors accommodate them, and men applaud and women think it’s really “cute” and an act of wifely love, is it even reasonable to hope that what the feminist health care movement has given to women in the U.S. will survive?




2 thoughts on “Closing the Aradia Clinic and the Future of the Feminist Women’s Health Care Movement

  1. That story about the woman asking her doctors to induce labor so her husband could go to that football game illustrates why the feminist health care movement is so important. What I wonder is why that was not malpractice. I know inducing labor is not considered a big deal, but merely for the sake of convenience? WTF? I read the story you linked. Some commenters thought it was appropriate, but others objected.

    Posted by Aletha | January 27, 2007, 7:50 am
  2. As long as there is no medical risk to the mom or baby, it is perfectly legal for a doctor to induce labor. I hear stories of this happening all the time. Even women who will induce because they want a particular doctor in the practice to deliver the baby and that doctor may not be available when they go into labor naturally. It’s absurd.

    Posted by Beth Kiley | October 4, 2007, 12:44 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Blog Stats

  • 2,600,338 hits

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.


The Farm at Huge Creek, Michigan Womyn's Music Festival, The Feminist Hullaballoo