you're reading...
Women's Birthing Rights, Women's Bodies, Women's Health

HPV Vaccine, HRT-Cancer Connection: “The Deadly Profits of Misogynist Medicine”

The latest issue of Ms. Magazine has an unfortunate article (which unfortunately is not online) about the HPV vaccine. The gist of it is that the vaccine is good for women and anyone who opposes it (and they only acknowledge opposition that is based on fears that it will promote promiscuity) is anti-woman. Nowhere is there any mention that there are concerns about both the effectiveness and safety of the vaccine that have not yet been fully addressed or that Merck, the company that manufactures the vaccine, has provided very significant funding to many of the legislators that are pushing the vaccine.But that actually isn’t what this post is about. This last week there was more confirmation that hormone replacement therapy is probably responsible for a significant percentage of breast, endometrial and ovarian cancer deaths during several decades. According to the Washington Post , “An awful lot of breast cancer was caused by doctors’ prescriptions,” said Larry Norton of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York. “That’s a very serious and sobering thought.”

I love Lucinda Marshall, founder of the Feminist Peace Network, who wrote this article.  Read the whole thing.  I have been a voice crying in the wilderness for DECADES now that in all likelihood, it is PRESCRIPTION HORMONES which are responsible for the huge rises in breast, ovarian, and uterine cancers in the United States and the UK.  Women who have spent their lifetimes studying these connections have been saying precisely the same thing.  Of course, we have to have a MALE DOCTOR admit to it before anybody takes it seriously, after who knows how many women have died. 

Thanks so much, Lucinda, for all you do.  I didn’t realize you were blogging and am adding you to the blogroll yesterday!

Along the same lines, from the Global Sisterhood Network, which I also love and can’t say enough good things about:

US: Sharp fall in breast cancer in 2003 linked to post-menopausal women’s decreased use of HRT

UK: Women taking HRT have increased risk of lethal cancers, stroke & thrombosis




15 thoughts on “HPV Vaccine, HRT-Cancer Connection: “The Deadly Profits of Misogynist Medicine”

  1. Thank-you for posting this! I actually got furious the other day when I heard a report on the radio that scientists had just confirmed that hormone replacement therapy has significant health risks to wimmin. Radical feminists figured that out decades ago!!!!

    And I’ve no doubt we will find that this HPV vaccine patriarchy is penetrating our daughters with will later be discovered to have more health risks than what it’s supposedly preventing.

    Posted by Sazz | April 23, 2007, 11:17 pm
  2. I’m shocked by the Ms. position. To me the HPV issue is the same as the pro-choice issue: the government doesn’t have the right to dictate how I or other women or girls manage our health. I don’t oppose the vaccine but I oppose its being required for anyone.

    Posted by Dr. K | April 24, 2007, 4:13 am
  3. I also saw that article in Ms., but though I was disappointed, I would not say I was surprised. Skepticism about vaccinations is rare even among feminists who should know better. However, I was disappointed and surprised by the National Women’s Health Network latest newsletter saying this:

    There should be a public outcry against mandatory HPV vaccine laws not because the vaccines are experimental (they are well-tested) or because they are dangerous (they aren’t). The currently proposed laws should be opposed because public health policy should never be orchestrated by corporations. The debate over mandatory HPV vaccination is an important one, but the debaters should be restricted to those who will not turn a profit from the decisions.

    Well-tested? Not dangerous? I beg to differ.

    The last of the three articles about the UK HRT study at the Global Sisterhood Network link I excerpted in the Free Soil blog news last Thursday. Many women have been scared off HRT, but AFAIK millions of women are still taking it, convinced by their doctors it really is not that dangerous.

    Posted by Aletha | April 24, 2007, 6:25 am
  4. The Feminist Majority/Ms. Magazine Feminist Wire has a story today, Texas Votes to Block Mandatory HPV Vaccines, that also fails to mention any concerns. Instead, this:

    The legislature’s ban counteracts an executive order issued in February by Governor Rick Perry (R), which would have protected women’s health by mandating the vaccine for eleven and twelve-year-olds.

    That story also does not mention that the governor’s office has estimated that only 25% of young women in Texas would get the vaccine if it is not mandatory. I found that item, which I would think would be a clue that there are issues with this vaccine, in a USA Today story.

    Posted by Aletha | April 27, 2007, 5:54 am
  5. If these were men, would the vaccine be mandatory? Why is there so much being done to my body by mainstream medicine, as a woman? Those are my questions.

    Posted by Kiuku | May 5, 2007, 4:46 am
  6. Posted by Sis today and moved to this thread by me, Heart: Pardon the formatting, and move or delete if you wish Heart.

    How the FDA caved once again and allowed MERCK to hide DEATHS caused to American FEMALE CHILDREN by GARDASIL:

    From Pam Martens

    “Why is Judicial Watch left to do the doing the heavy lifting while the NYT, National NOW and Legal Momentum are enablers to these human guinea pig medical experiments on children and young women.”

    Look at the number of serious adverse events in the
    new group. It works out to 19% of all reports being serious. That’s twice the normal rate for vaccines. And (…} 11 young women and girls are DEAD who did not need
    this unproven drug. They only needed to stay current with their pap smears when they were old enough to need them. And how about the 42% of pregnant women
    having adverse reactions, including spontaneous abortions. Remember, the FDA had data before it approved Gardasil showing an alarming rate of spontaneous abortions during the clinical trials. That data is right there on the FDA
    web site.

    We need to oust not just the Bush cabal but those Big
    Pharma sycophants at National NOW and Legal Momentum.

    Pam Martens

    New Gardasil Adverse Event Reports

    Judicial Watch Uncovers New FDA Records Detailing
    Deaths in 1,824 Adverse Reaction Reports Related to HPV Vaccine

    Judicial Watch Sues FDA for Producing “Partial Response” to {Freedom of Information Act} FOIA Request

    — Judicial Watch, the public interest group that
    investigates and
    prosecutes government corruption, today released new
    documents obtained
    from the U.S.
    Food and Drug Administration (FDA) under the
    provisions of the Freedom of
    Information Act, detailing 1,824 reports of adverse
    reactions to the
    for human papillomavirus (HPV), Gardasil, including
    as many as eight deaths
    related to the vaccine. Judicial Watch had previously
    obtained 1,637
    relating to Gardasil on May 15, 2007, bringing the
    known total to 3,461
    adverse reactions including eleven deaths since FDA
    approval. Among the new
    information uncovered by Judicial Watch:

    * “20-Jun-2007: Information has been
    received…concerning a 17 year
    old female who in June 2007…was vaccinated with a
    first dose of
    Gardasil…During the evening of the same day, the
    patient was found
    (lifeless) by the mother. Resuscitation was performed
    by the emergency
    physician but
    was unsuccessful. The patient subsequently died.”

    * “12-Jun-2007: Information has been
    received…concerning a 12 year
    old female with a history of aortic and mitral valve
    insufficiency…who on
    01-MAR-2007 was vaccinated IM into the left arm with
    a first does of
    Gardasil…On 01-MAR-2007 the patient presented to
    the ED with ventricular
    and died.”

    * “28-Aug-2007: Initial and follow-up
    information has been received
    from a physician concerning an “otherwise healthy” 13
    year old female who
    was vaccinated with her first and second doses of
    Gardasil. Subsequently, the
    patient experiencedŠparalysis from the chest down,
    lesions of the optic
    nerve…At the time of the report, the patient had
    not recovered.”

    From May 10 to September 7, 2007, the 1,824 adverse
    vaccination reactions
    reported to the FDA via the Vaccine Adverse Event
    Reporting System (VAERS)
    included 347 serious reactions. Of the 77 women who
    received the vaccine while pregnant, 33 experienced side effects ranging from spontaneous abortion to
    fetal abnormities. Other serious side effects
    continue to be reported
    paralysis, Bells Palsy, Guillain-Barre Syndrome, and

    “In light of this information, it is disturbing that
    state and local
    governments might mandate in any way this vaccine for
    young girls,” said
    Watch President Tom Fitton. “These adverse reaction
    reports suggest the
    not only causes serious side effects, but might even
    be fatal.”

    Judicial Watch filed its request on August 20, 2007,
    and received the
    adverse event reports from the FDA on September, 13

    (On October 3, 2007,
    Judicial Watch filed a new lawsuit against the FDA
    for its failure to fully
    respond to Judicial Watch’s FOIA request as required
    by law.) Judicial
    Watch has
    posted its lawsuit and the adverse event reports and
    deaths reported to
    on its Internet site, _www.judicialwatch.org_
    ( .

    Posted by womensspace | October 12, 2007, 7:25 pm
  7. I’ve been searching HERE for answers to my questions regarding this “vaccine.” Heart do you have any updates? Cancer runs rampant in my family and I’m looking into this to see the negative, all I’ve been hearing is how great it is for women and yaddi yaddi yah.

    Posted by Divine Purpose | January 4, 2008, 9:50 pm
  8. Article excerpts and link deleted because women more well versed than I am say it’s lacking. — Heart

    Posted by womensspace | January 4, 2008, 10:09 pm
  9. Sounds like you have looked very deeply into this, however, your conclusions are lacking some important information. When you say that the FDA is acknowledging that HPV does not cause cervical cancer…that is way out of context. There are several types of HPV, some of which are precursors to cervical cancer. Many people have or will become infected with HPV but these infections can clear up and the immune system can keep the virus in check without further damage. While not all people with HPV will get cervical cancer, nearly 100% of cervical cancer is preceded by infection of high-rish HPV types (16, 18, etc..). While I am skeptical as well of the way the vaccine has been promoted by Merck- please don’t mislead people about proven disease sequelae. Cervical cancer is caused by HPV…this is not an FDA conspriracy.

    Posted by Laura Jones | January 5, 2008, 6:43 am
  10. I am as opposed to the HPV vaccine as anyone, but this article disturbs me. I think it gets some of the facts wrong and puts a misleading spin on others. For instance, the very first sentence says Gardasil has been marketed and mandated for several years. Several is a vague term, but FDA approved Gardasil on June 8, 2006. There certainly were no mandates in place at that time. Texas governor Rick Perry tried to initiate the first state mandate less than a year ago. I am sorry, this is not several years. Also, many of the so-called revelations in that article are not things FDA ever tried to hide. In fact, the only revelation that was news to me was the increase in precancerous lesions in women already exposed to HPV. I appreciate Mr. Adams trying to bring out some of the problems with Gardasil which the public at large may not know, but exaggerating the case helps nobody.

    Posted by Aletha | January 5, 2008, 7:37 am
  11. Aletha and Laura, thanks, I deleted the excerpts and link because sounds like they are lacking. I didn’t have time to read carefully and mostly checked to make sure the website was, in general, coming from a good, consumer-friendly place.

    Do one of you have an update? I got one via e-mail a while ago and couldn’t find it looking for it yesterday. Maybe I’ll look again.

    Posted by womensspace | January 5, 2008, 4:15 pm
  12. apparently, gardasil has gained a reputation as being extraordinarily painful, and its trend of causing fainting has continued:

    Posted by ladoctorita | January 6, 2008, 6:02 pm
  13. eek, i had a comment, and then it went away, what happened? 😦

    Posted by ladoctorita | January 6, 2008, 6:05 pm
  14. Once again the lies from the Big Pharma come out. Does it really surprise you that this new drug causes pain and fucked up side effects?

    Posted by Phillipe Farneti | January 7, 2008, 5:55 pm
  15. i am furious with the gov’ts aproval as well as the doctor that administered this hpv vaccination to my daughter. our lives have completely changed to sleepness nights since…it is amazing how loyal doctors are to this drug..i can’t seem to find one doctor (female or male) that will admit all my daughter’s current pain is associated with the hpv vaccination. i am scared and don’t know where to turn to .

    Posted by kimberly hendrickson | March 3, 2008, 12:08 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Blog Stats

  • 2,600,142 hits

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.


The Farm at Huge Creek, Michigan Womyn's Music Festival, The Feminist Hullaballoo